External Websites: UCS De Rode Loper - Schaakpagina |
Hi! I'm Jos Heesen and playing with chess pieces and computers are my favourite pastimes. I'll try to combine the two while maintaining these pages.
Women, for whatever reasons, have not truly attained an equal footing with the male chessplayers. Madame Chaude de Silans, one of the better female players (in 1950 she was the first woman to play in an Olympic Chess Team (for France)), had this contemptuous remark on why her own sex didn't do better: "Women can't play chess because you have to keep quiet for five hours." On the other hand Milunka Lazarevich, a top Yugoslav female player, notes: "No one asks me why I play better than 19 million Yugoslavs, but only why I play weaker than some 100 (male) Yugoslavs." Indeed, the question has been raised many times: "Why can"t women play chess on the same level as men?". I"ve seen several answers. The best and funniest ones (in my opinion) were given by the late Jan Hein Donner (more about him elsewhere on this site!).
In 1968 he noted: ""However painful it may be, we must not shrink from the truth: women cannot play chess. And, if you ask me, they will never learn to play chess. ... And why can"t they play chess? After more than twenty-two years of pure scientific research, I think I have found an explanation. It is a well-known fact that a woman is superior to a man. Physically she is stronger. With her endless patience she will win, in the end, the everlasting battle of the sexes. She can think more logically... She has a far better memory... In everything a woman is superior to a man, but she misses one thing: intuition."
And: "I have studied Fraulein Jorger closely and attentively. In any aeroplane whatsoever, I would completely put myself in her hands, her piano playing is a delight, but chess... forget it, she is hopeless at it, just like any other woman."
A little bit later I hear the echo of a quote by Anna Garlin Spencer: "The failure of women to produce genius of the first rank in most of the supreme forms of human effort has been used to block the way of all women of talent and ambition for intellectual achievement in a manner that would be amusingly absurd were it not so monstrously unjust and socially harmful." This is what Donner has to say about the subject, in 1972: "The difference between the sexes in chess is remarkably big, but in my opinion no bigger than in any other cultural activity. Women can not play chess, like they can not paint, nor write literature, nor compose music, nor be a philosopher. In fact, there is nothing thought or done by a woman, that is worth noticing. So chess is not to blame. But what is? First of all a woman is far more stupid than a man. And, a woman is not at all capable to amuse herself."
A little bit later after he received some "fan" mail regarding his observation, he writes: "The authoress Hanny Michaelis protested against my assertion that women cannot write, citing a number of names as evidence to the contrary. What a ghastly list it was! The nastiest hags and frumps that ever wielded a pen!"
To another woman who wrote: "Donner forgot to mention the blacks. It should have been: women and blacks can not play chess, because they are too stupid", he answered: "She misses my point: black men can play chess, black women can not."
He adjusted his views a little bit in 1973: "The feeling of horror a real chessplayer gets when looking at women playing chess, should not make us blind for reality. They are not as silly as we like to think."
And even more in 1977, after Nona Gaprindashvili won the Lone Pine tournament: "Even in the world of chess there is at least one woman who rates as a world-class player. For inveterate masculinists and for those who must write jocular pieces to earn a living, this is a serious setback, which will naturally not prevent us in the least ... from continuing our struggle unabatedly."
And now, in 2002, Judith Polgar wins from Gary Kasparov (the World's number one for many years). This was the game:
Polgar, Judit - Kasparov, Garry, Moscow 2002 Rapid
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Nxe4 5. d4 Nd6 6. Bxc6 dxc6 7. dxe5 Nf5 8. Qxd8+ Kxd8 9. Nc3 h6 10. Rd1+ Ke8 11. h3 Be7 (11... a5 12. Bf4 Be6 13. g4 Ne7 14. Nd4 Nd5 15. Nce2 Bc5 16. Nxe6 fxe6 17. c4 Nb6 18. b3 a4 19. Bd2 Kf7 20. Bc3 Rhd8 21. Rxd8 Rxd8 22. Kg2 Rd3 23. Rc1 g5 24. Rc2 axb3 25. axb3 Nd7 26. Ra2 Be7 27. Ra7 Nc5 28. f3 Nxb3 29. Rxb7 Nc1 30. Nxc1 Rxc3 31. Ne2 Rc2 32. Kf1 Rxc4 33. Rxc7 {1/2-1/2 Kasparov-Kramnik, London 2000}) 12. Ne2 Nh4 (12... Bd7 13. b3 Rd8 14. Bb2 Rg8 15. Rd2 Bc8 16. Rad1 Rxd2 17. Nxd2 g5 18. g4 Ng7 19. Ne4 Ne6 20. Bc1 Rg6 21. Be3 c5 22. N2g3 b6 23. Nh5 Ng7 24. Nhf6+ Kf8 25. Nh7+ Kg8 26. Nef6+ Kh8 27. Nf8 Bxf8 28. Rd8 Ne6 29. Rxc8 Kg7 30. Nd5 h5 31. gxh5 Rh6 32. Nf6 Rh8 33. Kg2 Kh6 34. h4 Bg7 35. hxg5+ Nxg5 36. Rxh8+ Bxh8 37. Ne4 (1-0 Lasker,E-Herz/Lewitt/Keidanski, Berlin 1896)) 13. Nxh4 Bxh4 14. Be3 Bf5 15. Nd4 Bh7 16. g4 Be7 17. Kg2 h5 18. Nf5 Bf8 19. Kf3 Bg6 20. Rd2 hxg4+ 21. hxg4 (Inferior is 21. Kxg4 Rd8) 21... Rh3+ 22. Kg2 Rh7 23. Kg3 f6 24. Bf4 Bxf5 25. gxf5 fxe5 26. Re1 Bd6 27. Bxe5 Kd7 28. c4 c5 29. Bxd6 cxd6 30. Re6 Rah8 31. Rexd6+ Kc8 32. R2d5 Rh3+ 33. Kg2 Rh2+ 34. Kf3 R2h3+ 35. Ke4 b6 36. Rc6+ Kb8 37. Rd7 Rh2 38. Ke3 Rf8 39. Rcc7 Rxf5 40. Rb7+ Kc8 41. Rdc7+ Kd8 42. Rxg7 Kc8 1-0
Alas Donner did not live to see this happen.
On the web there are several sites taking a look at "Female Chess" one way or the other:
See this link to combine playing chess with a computer and a woman...
The text below appeared in Mark Week's About Chess
The history of female chess champions began with the formation of FIDE in 1924. Although then FIDE had had no impact on the World Chess Championship for more than 20 years, its impact on women's chess, which had been largely ignored, was immediate and profound. At its 3rd Congress, Budapest 1926, FIDE organized several events, among them a team tournament and a women's tournament. At its 4th Congress, London 1927, those events morphed into the first Olympiad and the first Women's World Championship.
The reign of Menchik
The 1927 Women's Championship was won by Vera Francevna Menchik, born 1906 in Moscow, daughter of a Czech father and an English mother. At the age of nine she learned chess and as a teenager moved with her family to London, where she took chess lessons from Geza Maroczy (Hungarian, 1870-1951), at the time one of the top-10 players in the world.
Menchik's dominance of women's chess was absolute. Except for the second Olympiad, The Hague 1928, the first seven Women's World Championships were held every two years together with an Olympiad. Menchik won all seven events, losing only one game and drawing four out of 83 games played. She also won a 1937 title match against her chief rival, Sonja Graf-Stevenson (German/American, 1914-1965).
In 1937 Menchik married Rufus Henry Streatfeild Stevenson (British, 1878-1943), a U.K. chess organizer. Stevenson's first wife Agnes, four times British Women's Champion, had died tragically in 1935, when she walked into the propellers of the airplane waiting to take her to the Warsaw tournament. Menchik also met a tragic death in June 1944. She was killed with her mother and chess-playing sister during one of the last German air attacks on London. The British Chess Magazine wrote:
"The death by enemy action of Miss Vera Menchik removes not only the greatest woman chess player of all times but a charming personality. The world will remember her for her chess prowess, for her exceptional skill as a woman player who had beaten in tournament play such gifted players as Euwe, Sultan Khan, Sir George Thomas, Alexander, and Yates. In such company, and she played in several of the Hastings International tournaments and others of similar grade, she usually obtained about 33%, though in the Maribor tournament of 1934 she finished third, behind Pirc and Steiner but ahead of Rejfir, Spielmann, Asztalos, and Vidmar. Her game was characterized by solid position-play, with the definite aim of bringing about a favourable end-game and of avoiding wild complications. The ordinary stratagems of the game, small combinations and the like, were of course part of her equipment, but she lacked that imaginative, inventive spirit without few become really great players."
The last sentence ('she lacked that imaginative, inventive spirit') was a common observation about early women's chess. Whether valid or not at the time, the prejudice that women's chess is somehow boring or uninteresting has long ceased to be true.
FIDE introduces cycles
Like most organized chess, FIDE lay dormant during the 2nd World War. After the death in 1946 of World Champion Alexander Alekhine at Estoril, Portugal, FIDE took control of all activities related to the World Chess Championship (Euwe became World Champion for a day then!). It organized events to produce a new World Champion plus a steady supply of challengers from staged competitions. Parallel to this FIDE introduced a similar system for the Women's World Championship.
The first women's event was a 16-player round robin with entrants from 12 countries, started December 1949 at Moscow. Soviet players captured the first four places. Liudmila Rudenko of Leningrad won the event (+9-1=5), one point ahead of 2nd place Olga Rubtsova of Moscow. The first Candidates Tournament for women was held at Moscow in 1952. Elizaveta Bikova won the event (+11-3=1), one point ahead of 2nd/3rd places, earning the right to face Rudenko in the first modern Women's World Championship match. Behind by one point in the last game, Rudenko needed a win to retain the title. She fought hard, but lost. Elizaveta Bikova thus beat Rudenko (+7-5=2) to become the second women's World Champion. The second Candidates Tournament, Moscow 1955, was won by Rubtsova (+13-2=4), one-half point ahead of 2nd place. FIDE decided that the World Championship would be a triangular match of the three strongest players in the world. Olga Rubtsova won at Moscow in 1956, one-half point ahead of Bikova who finished five points of Rudenko. With no intervening Candidates event, Bikova regained the title at Moscow in 1958, beating Rubtsova (+7-4=3). She accomplished the first successful defense of the title by beating Kira Zvorikina, winner of the Candidates Tournament, with a score of +6-2=5 at Moscow in 1959.
The reign of Gaprindashvili
The fourth Candidates Tournament, Vrnjacka Banja 1961, was won by Nona Gaprindashvili of Georgia (+10-0=6) two points ahead of 2nd place. Gaprindashvili crushed Bikova (+7-0=4) in the title match, Moscow 1962, to become the fourth Women's World Champion. Gaprindashvili defended her title against Alla Kushnir of Russia in matches at Riga 1965 (+7-3=3), Tbilisi/Moscow 1969 (+7-2=5), and Riga 1972 (+5-4=7). Her last successful title defense (+8-3=1) was against her compatriot Nana Alexandria of Georgia at Pitsounda/Tbilisi 1975.
For the 1970-72 cycle, FIDE introduced the same qualification sequence used in the unrestricted World Championship : an Interzonal Tournament followed by a series of Candidates Matches. The first Women's Interzonal Tournament, Ohrid 1971, was won by Alexandria ahead of Milunka Lazarevic and Tatiana Zatulovskaya. The three were joined by Kushnir in the Candidates Matches, where Kushnir beat Alexandria (+6-2=1) in the final match at Kislovodsk 1971.
The reign of Chiburdanidze
The 1976-78 cycle saw two Interzonals at Roosendaal and Tbilisi. Maia Chiburdanidze of Georgia finished second at Tbilisi behind Elena Fatalibekova, the daughter of Olga Rubtsova, third World Champion. Fatalibekova was eliminated in a semifinal Candidates match by Kushnir, but Chiburdanidze beat Alexandria (+3-2=5), Elena Akhmilovskaya (+4-3=5), and Kushnir (+4-3=7) to earn the right to challenge Gaprindashvili.
When 17-year old Maia Chiburdanidze beat Gaprindashvili (+4-2=9) at Tbilisi in 1978, the torch passed from one generation of Georgian women champions to the next. She defended her title against Alexandria at Borsomi/Tbilisi 1981 (+4-4=8), Irina Levitina at Volgograd 1984 (+5-2=6), Akhmilovskaya at Sofia 1986 (+4-1=9), and Nana Ioseliani at Telavi 1988 (+3-2=11). FIDE changed the format for the 1985-86 cycle by reintroducing a Candidates tournament, Malmo 1986, in place of the matches. The winner of the Malmo tournament, Elena Akhmilovskaya, is better known today as Mrs. John Donaldson. She eloped with the American IM during the 1988 Olympiad in Greece, where Donaldson was the team captain.
The reign of the Hungarians and the Chinese
The Georgian domination of women's international chess ended abruptly at Manila 1991, when the young Chinese star Xie Jun beat Chiburdanidze (+4-2=9). She had earned the right to be challenger by finishing second behind Gaprindashvili at the 1990 Interzonal in Kuala Lumpur, tying with Alisa Maric at the Candidates Tournament, Borzomi 1990, then beating Maric (+3-1=3) in a tiebreak match.
Xie Jun's victory set the stage for a clash with Zsuzsa (Susan) Polgar, the eldest of the famous Polgar sisters - Susan, Sofia, and Judit - of Hungary. When Judit emerged as the strongest of the three, the family decided that she would seek the unrestricted World Championship, while Susan would seek the Women's World Championship.
Zsuzsa Polgar, 23 years old, easily won the women's Candidates Tournament, Shanghai 1992, three points ahead of Ioseliani and Chiburdanidze. The FIDE rules stipulated that the top two candidates would meet in a final match to decide Xie Jun's challenger. Since Ioseliani had the higher tiebreak, she was tapped for the match with Polgar. Few observers expected the Polgar - Ioseliani match to be more than a formality. At the start of the 8-game match, Monaco 1993, the Hungarian outrated her Georgian opponent by 100 rating points. After Polgar won the first two games and drew the next three, she needed only one point in the last three games to clinch the win. Ioseliani won the sixth game, drew the seventh, and won the eighth to take the match into a two-game tiebreak. Polgar won the first tiebreak game, but Ioseliani won the second, forcing a second two-game tiebreak. When the pattern repeated - Polgar winning then Ioselani - FIDE ruled that the match would be decided by a lottery. This time Ioseliani won, eliminating Polgar from the cycle. The title match was an anticlimax. Ioseliani's luck ran out and Xie Jun defeated her decisively (+7-1=3) at Monaco 1993.
The next cycle was all Zsuzsa Polgar's. After tying with Chiburdanidze in the Candidates Tournament, Tilburg 1994, she beat the ex-World Champion in the final match (+4-0=3), St. Petersburg 1995. She went on to beat Xie Jun (+6-2=5) at Jaen 1996, giving the Polgar family its first World Champion. The chess world did not suspect that this would be the last classic match played on the terms in effect since Bikova - Rudenko 1953.
The next Candidates Tournament, Groningen 1997, was organized concurrent with the first of the FIDE World Championship Knockout tournaments. Alisa Galliamova and Xie Jun finished 1st and 2nd, seeding them into the final match. Susan Polgar's sister Judit competed in the Knockout event, but was eliminated in the second round. Her best result in FIDE Knockout events was Las Vegas 1999, when she was eliminated in the 5th round by Alexander Khalifman, the eventual winner of the tournament and the title.
The final match in the Women's Championship was scheduled to be played in Shenyang, after sponsors from China made the best offer for the prize fund. Galliamova refused to play the entire match in China and the win was awarded by default to Xie Jun. The title match would be Polgar - Xie Jun II. By the time FIDE announced the date and venue for the title match, Polgar had given birth to her first child. She considered that the time to recover from childbirth and to prepare for the new match was insufficient. She requested that the match be postponed, FIDE refused, and negotiations broke down. After the contract deadline passed, FIDE declared that the title match would be played between Xie Jun and Galliamova. The forfeited Candidates match was to be resurrected as a title match! The 1999 match, with a venue split between Kazan and Shenyang, was won by Xie Jun (+5-3=7).
A year later, at New Delhi 2000, Xie Jun defended her title by winning the first Women's Championship played with the knockout format. She beat her compatriot Qin Kanying (+1-0=3) in the final match of the six round event.
The Chinese dominance was reconfirmed when Zhu Chen beat Alexandra Kosteniuk (+2-2=0; +1-1=0; +2-0=0) in the final match of the Moscow 2001 knockout event.
In this summary of female World Champions by Mark Weeks I miss Judit Polgar: the strongest female chessplayer ever. She just refuses to become a female World Champion! I make up for this with a short bio: Judit Polgar (born July 23, 1976) is a Hungarian chess player. Easily the best female chess player in history, in the April 2004 FIDE rating list (including men and women) she was ranked number nine in the world with an Elo rating of 2728. Judit and her two older sisters (Zsuzsa (GM) and Zsofia (IM)) (from right to left in the picture below) were reportedly part of a educational experiment carried out by their father in an effort to prove that women could achieve high mental aptitude when trained from a very early age. He set out to educate his daughters in many fields, not merely chess, but all three latched on to the game at a young age, and have achieved heights in chess few men ever achieve. |
Judit could almost certainly have won the title of Women's World Champion of Chess several times over. No other woman was even in the top 100 of the January 2004 FIDE rating list. However, she has refused to participate in women-only chess events, stating that she wants to be the true World Champion of Chess. Amongst her achievements are earning the men's Grandmaster title at the then-record age of 15 years and 4 months, one month earlier than Bobby Fischer's previous record. |
Her climb up the ranks once seemed to put her on target for the world championship, but although she has played many winning games against some of the world's best players, she has yet to win a major tournament. She has also been unable to beat former champion Garry Kasparov in any of their encounters in standard time control games. In 2002, she finally beat Kasparov in a rapid game of the "Russia vs The Rest of the World 2002" tournament.
This is what Johannes Fischer wrote in "KARL das kulturelle Schachmagazin":
"Seit ihrer Kindheit erregt Judit Polgar die Gemuter. Sie ist die jungste und erfolgreichste der drei Polgar-Schwestern und damit Teil eines paedagogischen Experiments von Vater Laszlo Polgar, der glaubt, Genie sei nicht angeboren, sondern anerzogen. Den Beweis fuer diese These versuchte er mit radikalen Methoden anzutreten: Da er der Ansicht war, die Schule wuerde Kinder nicht ausreichend fordern, erzog er seine Tochter zusammen mit seiner Frau Klara zu Hause. Spater schilderte Judit in einem Interview einen fuer sie und ihre Schwestern typischen Tag: "Wir stehen um sechs auf. Um sieben gehen wir in einen Tischtennis-Klub, wo wir zwei bis drei Stunden Tischtennis spielen. Dann gehen wir nach Hause, spielen Schach, empfangen Gaste, Journalisten. Und danach horen wir Musik, lesen ein bisschen. Normalerweise spielen wir sechs bis acht Stunden Schach am Tag." (Dirk Jan ten Geuzendam, "Interview with Judit Polgar", New in Chess , 8/1989, S.34).
Die Erfolge von Laszlos Methoden sind bekannt, aber rufen gemischte Gefuehle hervor: kann man, darf man so seine Kinder erziehen? Erinnert dieses Experiment nicht an Kinder, die mit aller Gewalt zu Turnstars gemacht wurden und spater mit fruh verbrauchten Korpern bitter fuer die fruehen Erfolge zahlen mussten? Aber zeigt dieses Experiment nicht auch, wie schlecht es um die Erziehung von Kindern in unserer Gesellschaft bestellt ist, wie viel Potenzial bei fast jedem verloren geht, eben weil er oder sie nicht richtig gefordert wird?
In der Schachwelt brachten Judit Polgars Erfolge den Glauben ins Wanken, Frauen konnten von Natur aus kein Schach spielen, denn die Ungarin schien genug Talent und Energie zu besitzen, um den Weltmeisterthorn der Maenner einnehmen zu konnen. Die Reaktionen folgten prompt. Herabsetzung, wie z.B. durch den ehemaligen Kasparow-Trainer Alexander Nikitin, der nach der 4,5:5,5 Niederlage von Boris Spasski in einem 1993 in Budapest ausgetragenen Wettkampf gegen Judit Polgar, schrieb: "Ich verstehe noch immer nicht ganz, warum Boris sich auf diese Sache eingelassen hat ... Wenn er verliert, wurden die Leute sagen: gegen ein kleines Madchen verlieren, wie tief kann man sinken?" (New in Chess , 2/93, S. 46) oder das Beschworen der Natur wie durch Garry Kasparow 1990: "Es ist unvermeidlich, dass die Natur gegen sie arbeitet, und das sehr bald. Sie besitzt phantastisches Schachtalent, aber sie ist trotz allem eine Frau. Das liegt alles an den Unvollkommenheiten der weiblichen Psyche. Keine Frau kann einen langeren Kampf durchhalten. Sie kampft gegen die Gewohnheit von Jahrhunderten und Jahrhunderten, seit Anbeginn der Welt." (Zitiert in Alex Dunne, 2010 Chess Oddities, S.78)
Viele junge Schachspielerinnen sehen in Judit Polgar ein Rollenmodell, anderen jedoch ist sie unbequem. Aber nicht, weil sie regelmassig gegen Polgar verlieren. Im Gegenteil: Judit Polgar weigert sich in schwach besetzten Frauenturnieren anzutreten und spielt nur bei den Mannern mit. Einzige Ausnahme waren die Schacholympiaden 1988 in Saloniki und 1990 in Novi Sad, wo sie mit ihren Schwestern Zsuzsa und Sofie sowie Idliko Madl beide Male Gold fuer Ungarn gewann. Judit Polgar hat nie versucht, Frauenweltmeisterin zu werden, obwohl sie als mit Abstand beste Schachspielerin der Welt damit leicht Titel und Tausende von Dollar hatte gewinnen konnen.
Judits Weigerung in Frauenturnieren zu spielen, bricht ein Tabu. Schliesslich sollte es zu denken geben, wenn die beste Frau der Welt Frauenturniere vermeidet. Vielleicht verfuhren die leichteren Frauenturniere, in denen schneller und mit viel weniger Einsatz Erfolge zu erzielen sind, talentierte Frauen, ihr Talent nicht zu entfalten? Diese Uberlegung wiederum gefahrdet die Nische Frauenschach. Sicher, eine Frau mag sich in der Mannerwelt des Schachs nicht immer wohl fuhlen, aber die Frauen, die dabei bleiben und halbwegs gut spielen, kommen in den Genuss einer Reihe von Privilegien. Denn anders als im Berufsleben erhalten sie fuer die gleiche Leistung nicht weniger, sondern mehr Geld. In der Frauenbundesliga, bei Frauenturnieren und in zahlreichen Open, bei denen Sonderpreise fur Frauen ausgelobt werden. Mehr Aufmerksamkeit bekommen sie sowieso. Elisabeth Pahtz, bei den Frauen in Deutschland die Nummer Zwei, zieht mehr mediales Interesse auf sich, als die gesamte deutsche Herrenmannschaft aus Alexander Graf, Christopher Lutz, Jan Gustafsson, Leonid Kritz und Klaus Bischoff.
Aber die Trennung in Manner- und Frauenschach ermutigt talentierte Madchen nicht nur, sich mit weniger zu begnugen, als sie erreichen konnten, sie ist auch in anderer Hinsicht problematisch. Gerne schmuckt sich das Schach damit, Eigenschaften wie Selbstdisziplin, analytisches Denken, uberlegtes Handeln usw. zu vermitteln, die im Leben, insbesondere im Berufsleben, wichtig sind. Wenn dies stimmt, was sagt das dann uber die Chancen der Frauen im Berufsleben? Ist der Umstand, dass so wenige Frauen gut Schach spielen dann nicht ein Beleg dafuer, dass Frauen im Arbeitsleben noch immer benachteiligt werden? Mit anderen Worten: Schneiden sie in Sachen berufliche Qualifikation naturgegeben schlechter ab als Manner? Die Zahlen sprechen eine andere Sprache. Erst kurzlich veroffentlichte der Spiegel eine Untersuchung, die zeigt, dass die Schulnoten und Universitatsabschlusse von Frauen im Vergleich zu denen der Manner immer besser werden und in mehr und mehr Bereichen des Lebens besetzen Frauen zunehmend wichtige Positionen – trotz immer noch herrschender Benachteiligung.
Tatsachlich geht es bei der Diskussion um das Phanomen Judit Polgar um mehr als nur Schach: Das Selbstverständnis als Mann und Frau, gesellschaftliche Rollen und scheinbare Gewissheiten, mit denen man aufgewachsen ist, stehen auf dem Spiel. Und das Schone am Phanomen Judit Polgar ist, dass es alte Denkmuster aufbricht. So wurde ihr seit Beginn ihrer Laufbahn prophezeit, ihre Schachkarriere wurde spatestens dann einen Knick bekommen, wenn sie eine Familie grundet. Jetzt, wo sie im August ihr erstes Kind bekommen hat, wird man sehen, ob das zutrifft. Vielleicht straft sie alle Pessimisten Lugen und spielt nach Babypause besser als je zuvor. Es ware ihr und der Schachwelt zu gonnen."
Below I list the female chess worldchampions. For each champion I provide a list of links with details about her.
Below some other links to female champions:
And, now for something completely different (and indeed: if you take a look at Female chessplayers, why not at Jewish and Black chessplayers?):
I admire the late Jan Hein Donner (1927-1988) more for his writings than for his chess, although he won the Dutch championship three times (in 1954, 1957 and 1958) and had some international success (in Beverwijk 1963 first, ahead of Bronstein, and in Venice 1967 first, ahead of Petrosian). On August 24, 1983 Donner suffered a brain hemorrhage that ended his playing career at age 56 ("Just in time, because at age 56 your chess is not as good as at age 26" he sardonically put it). He died at 61, on November 27, 1988. His friends Tim Krabbe and Max Pam compiled his best writings into one volume: "The King: chess pieces". That's a book I can recommend to anyone, and I'm not the only one who thinks so: |
Johannes Hendrikus (Jan Hein) Donner was born on July 6, 1927 in The Hague (by the way: Adolph Anderssen was born on July 6 too!). He learnt to play chess on August 22, 1941. This exact date was remembered because it was the same day his father was imprisoned by the Germans (remember it was World War 2). He had a special talent for chess, since one year later he played Euwe (see Krabbe's Open Chess Diary (no 116) where Krabbe writes about the first time Donner met Euwe). In 1944 he joined DD (Discendo Discimus). He was a member of this famous Dutch chess club all his life. In 1945 he started his law studies at the University of Amsterdam, but spent most of his time there studying and playing chess. He got international fame in the Hoogovens tournament in 1950. He took first place before Euwe and Rossolimo. In 1952 he became an IM and in 1959 an IGM. In 1954 he wins the Dutch Championship and ends thus the 33 year (!) reign of Euwe. |
||
When asked to mention his best game, he said: "... very little remains of the hundreds of games I played. Maybe one. A short one, but one that shows some of the perfection I always sought for, but almost never found ..." The game he refers to is: Donner-Troianescu, 1957 that went as follows: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5 5. Bd3 O-O 6. Nf3 d5 7. O-O Nc6 8. a3 cxd4 9. exd4 dxc4 10. Bxc4 Be7 11. Re1 a6 12. Ba2 b5 13. d5 exd5 14. Nxd5 Nxd5 15. Qxd5 Bb7 16. Qh5 g6 17. Qh6 Nd4 18. Ng5 Bxg5 19. Bxg5 Qb6 20. Rad1 Rac8 21. Re7 Qd6 22. Kh1 Qc6 23. Rxb7 Nf5 24. Bd5 Qc2 25. Rc1 Qe2 26. Bxf7+ Kh8 1-0. |
Jan Hein Donner was famous for his "live" game commentary during the IBM and Hoogovens tournaments. In the drawing by Rupert van der Linden (above) he comments on a game Timman-Lobron (1983).
Here you find the links to some of my chessgames which I consider to be my masterpieces... So far there are only two, but one of these days...
The 'hit' statistics are done, since the end of July 1999, by NedStat (click the following icon to see them):