|
3.Results The shell velocity curves are not very different
for the various values of s. See Fig 3.1
Fig 3.1 Shell speed during one stroke. Note: The front loaded catch has
the minimum speed loss after the catch. |
|
Table 3.1 displays a summary of the other
results. The variation in time to cover the 2000m is very small. The same for
the other results. The variations are of the same order of magnitude as the
accuracy of the calculations.
Table 3.1 |
|
Fig 3.2 displays graphically again how the
2000m time varies with the parameter s. If a maximum really exists is quest able.
Fig 3.2 Time for 2000m as function of s. 4. Conclusion From the analysis as presented above it is
very difficult to draw a firm conclusion but Fig 3.2 shows a very small
advantage of the front loaded catch. Another conclusion might be that very
little profit can be obtained by varying this aspect of the drive. But note:
this might be valid for this purely mechanical system. The human rower might
very well be shaped to perform best with a certain shape of the drive curve. |