BACK TO 4M RX

50 / 70 MHz dual band antenna comparison

The figures given are the result of computer simulations, not real world figures !

Antenna
simulated using 4NEC2
Feed type Boom length (m)   50.2  MHz       70.2 MHz       NEC2
Gain (dBi) F/B (dB) Feed Z (Ω) DL6WU (dB)* Gain (dBi) F/B (dB) Feed Z (Ω) DL6WU (dB)* SWR 1:2 (kHz) ΣDL6WU
(dB)*
.nec
DK7ZB trio 2/2 Open sleeve 1.1 6.6 8.8 50 0.7 6.4 11.0 50 -0.6 1700 +0.2
OK1CDJ duo 2/2 Open sleeve 1.4 6.4 20.8 50 -0.1 6.9 14.7 50 -0.8 2700 -0.9

W4RNL duo 3/4

Parallel 2.0 7.1+ 17.3+   50+ -0.6 8.2 17.9 50 -0.6 3700 -1.3
G0KSC duo 4/4 Open sleeve 2.1 8.6 20.3 50 +0.7 8.4 17.6 50 -0.6 900 +0.1
GW3YDX duo 3/4 Open sleeve 2.2 7.2** 18.7** 50 -0.9 8.9** 21.4** 50 -0.3 -1.1
G0KSC duo 3/3

Open sleeve

3.2 8.1 12.0 50 -1.2 8.3 12.7 50 -2.1 1500 -3.3
DK7ZB 5ele Dipole 3.2 - - - - 10.7 25.9 28 +0.2 3100 -
G0KSC duo 4/5 Open sleeve 3.5 9.1 14.5 50 -0.5 10.3 19.6 50 -0.5 1100 -0.9
OH1ZAA duo 4/5 Dual 4.0 10.7 17.6++ 16+j5.6 +0.7 10.4 16.5++ 6.8+j6.5 -0.8 370 -0.1
GW3YDX duo 4/5 Parallel 4.1 9.4 17.0 50 -0.7 10.8 13.7 50 -0.5 750 -1.2
YU7EF duo 5/5 Open sleeve 4.2 10.2 30,3 50 +0.0 9.8 18.2 50 -1.5 2200 -1.5
GW3YDX duo 5/5 Open sleeve 4.2 10.1** 29.1** 50 -0.1 10.0** 17.6** 50 -1.4 -1.5
G0KSC duo 6/5 Open sleeve 4.9 11.1 17.2 50 +0.3 10.5 14,9 50 -1.4 900 -1.1

DK7ZB 6ele

Dipole 5.1 - - - - 12.4 19.2 28 +0.4 2300 -
PA5DD duo 5/6 Open sleeve 5.4 10.5 23.4 50 -0.6 12.0 20.1 50 -0.2 700 -0.8
PA0TBR duo 6/6 Open sleeve 5.5 11.2 13.7 50 +0.1 12.3 11.8 50 +0.0 820 +0.1
YU7EF duo 6/7 Open sleeve 5.9 11.6 20.5 50 +0.2 10.8 19.4 50 -1.7 900 -1.5
DK7ZB 7ele Dipole 6.4 - - - - 13.0 30.1 28 +0.2 3000 -
IW0FFK duo 6/7 Dual 7.3 12.3 9.8 15 - j 47 +0.2 12.0 16.1 28 -1.3 4000 -1.1
YU7EF duo 7/8*** Open sleeve 9.0 13.0 22.1 50 +0.2 12.9 28.6 50 -1.0 1600 -0.8
DK7ZB 9ele Dipole 10.0 - - - - 14.6 34.2 28 +0.3 2300 -

* Gain relative to regression of DL6WU yagis for a given boom length. Formula from DJ9BV DUBUS 03/1988 [7.773*LOG(Boom/λ)+11.43]dBi
** Manufacteurs (reliable) claim
*** Published in DUBUS 02/2007,  p. 77
+ Antenna optimized for 52 MHz
++ F/B much better a bit lower in frequency. Probably because the antenna was designed using MININEC

DK7ZB designs listed as benchmarks

The simulations are "best effort". All files have passed a segmentation check and the "Average Gain Test".

Note on NEC2 modelling: Dual band antennas will often give segmentation check errors because two elements of different length are close to each other. This will lead to non-aligned segments in the two elements. The trick to avoid this is to chop up the longest element into 3 wires (GW). A central wire being the same length as the shorter element, and two wires at each end to bring the element back to the original length


 

IW0FFK band isolation (simulated in MMANA-GAL by placing a load in non-excited feed element and reading magnitude of current)

U excited feed
(V)
I excited feed
(mA)
P excited feed
(mW)
Z non-excited feed (Ω) I│ non-excited feed (mA) P non-excited feed (mW) 4m > 6m
(dB)
6m > 4m
(dB)
1 +j0 5.02+j18.16 18.84 10 0.981 0.0096 -33
18.84 50 0.950 0.0451 -26
18.84 100 0.881 0.0776 -24
1 +j0 35.71+j0 35.48 10 7.41 0.549 -18
35.48 50 6.91 2.387 -12
35.48 100 6.07 3.685 -10

BACK TO 4M RX